Until I believe that taste if argues, yes, however in another sphere of boarding. With the evolution of the technology in the digital reproduction of images, art book impressions, medias and other vehicles that allow the iconographic spreading, the images they had reached some layers of the society, what it would become the action of the specialists most opportune. To if placing ahead of a work of art, the man still reveals unsafe, proving that the expansion of the exposition and propagation of these icons did not attenuate the confused reflection of the readers who had consumed such publications (many times, still, of high cost). It is evident that the consumption of these appreciations for the most efficient conductors of knowledge printed matter, or virtual, by itself, they are not enough for the refinement of the appreciation of the work of art, therefore this is not a branch of the theoretical knowledge (simply), neither a satisfaction of the emotional one, but an ability acquired through the development of abilities of ' ' leitura' ' reflection. An aptitude that can be cultivated e, consequently, refined.

If it will not be exerted, such ability, it can atrophy and block the pleasure to appreciate a work of art. The impulse to develop these abilities and abilities as much commented in the education processes learning, through the National Curricular Parameters – it varies very in each person. The multicriteria construction of these mechanisms will be able to take the apreciador to face the art as creation of one forms expressive, one something new in the universe, for being fruit of the creation, resulted of a production human being, pulling out the being of not being. It, the art, is expressive for bringing an end in itself and communicates some thing, contends a message, what she becomes it a language. From then on, we can, calmly, preparing in them for the appreciation, critical, reflexiva and dialogued of a work of art.